Tag Archives: Genesis

Genesis 20

Here again is another example of how not to do things. Abraham wasn’t perfect – and in this exchange we see that a non-believer such as Abimelech can behave far better, more righteously than Abraham who is supposed to be a friend of God. How often have seen that though – people who claim to be Christians, and yet if you look at their behaviour, you’d never guess that were the case.

There are a lot of good things about the Bible, and one of them, although sometimes it can be confusing, is that there are many examples of how not to be a believer. Abraham messes it up on several occasions, and yet he is a hero of the faith. In fact many of the people we consider to be great in the Bible really made a mess – David, Noah, Isaac, Peter, Thomas, Barnabas. Those are just the one off the top of my head. These examples are recorded in the Bible not as something to copy, but rather as something to encourage us – even these people did a rubbish job at times!

This episode is partiuclarly interesting because it’s the same sin that Abraham commits. He has been blessed by God so much since the last time he indulged in this sin, and yet, again he decides to do the wrong thing in exactly the same way.

Sometimes we develop a habit of sin, often as a way of coping with things. Abraham’s way of coping with scary situations was to lie his way out of them, putting his wife at risk, as well as others. Because he had failed to deal wtih it adequately before, this remained a coping mechanism for him, even though it was sinful. Had he addressed it previously, it is likely that he would either not have gone to Gerar, or would have dealt with the situaiton differently. We need to be careful of those things in our past that we haven’t dealt with. Past sins need to be dealt with and dispatched so we can move on.

Also, the fact that Abraham indulged in the same sin in the same situation suggests that he hadn’t learnt sufficiently from it that last time it came around. Abraham gets another go at getting it right, and fails. Instead of Abraham keeping his eyes on God, he keeps his eyes on the problem (and has therefore taken his eyes off God). As believers we are to live by faith. There’s generally a lot going on that we can’t see, as hindsight frequently shows.

Unfortunately, this time Sarah joins Abraham in his sin and backs him up. This just goes to show that we tend to match the sinfulness of others rather than their righteousness.

One of the problems with the Abraham houshold was that they had justified to themselves that such deceit wasn’t lying since it was half true. If it’s only half true, it’s still a lie, even if only by omission. In fact telling half-truths could be even worse than an outright lie because by telling half-truths you’re more likely to convince yourself that you’re not lying. Once you’re able to deceive yourself, then you’re in big trouble.

 

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 19

Another lesson on ‘how not to do it’ by Lot. In fact, Warren Wiersbe goes further and shows that Lot can easily be contrasted with Abraham to see someone controlled by worldly desires and Abraham dedicated wholly to God.  Whereas Abraham travelled light and waited on God for his instructions, Lot put down roots and settled in the worldliest of worldly places. He ended up in Sodom not because God directed him there, but because that’s where he settled, thinking he could build a life for himself there – and for a while he was right; although he was an outsider, he achieved a position of authority, spending his time at the town gate where the town’s political business was conducted. This shows how integrated Lot and his family were in Sodom.

Being ‘in the world’ but not ‘of the world’ springs to mind. Something that Lot doesn’t seem to have achieved. Whenever we see Lot, he appears to have his opinions and decisions dictated by worldly interests – possessions, wealth, and trying to live quietly and keep his nose clean.

What’s interesting is that Abraham met three heavenly persons – one of them a theophany – Jesus in his precarnate state. However, in Sodom there are only two angels. Why? Possibly because of the sinful and worldly nature of Lot made it so that Jesus couldn’t dwell with him as he could with Abraham (even though Abraham was imperfect, his faith made him righteous).

The contrasts can be taken further between Abraham and Lot. Whereas Abraham was prepared to sacrifice his son to God, Lot was prepared to sacrifice both his daughters to the world, just for the sake of keeping the peace.

It’s very important to remember that just because something’s in the Bible, it’s not necessarily there because it’s a good thing. In this chapter we have Lot attempting to swap his male visitors for his daughters so that the residents of Sodom can rape his family members instead of his guests. Questionable morals there. This passage had confused me for a long time until I realised that there are examples of people not behaving as God intended as well as the reverse. I wrestled for ages with ‘why would God prefer Lot’s daughters to be raped than Lot’s angelic guests?’ The answer is he didn’t want anyone to get raped, that’s why the angels were sent in the first place because things were horribly wrong in Sodom.

Then there’s this bit at the end about incest, with Lot’s daughters getting him drunk and then sleeping with him. Some have considered that as this event occurred before the giving of the Law on Sinai, that incest was OK as perhaps the genepool hadn’t yet been so polluted by sin. However, from reading the passage itself it’s clear that a certain level of morality already existed – Lot’s daughters knew that in order to accomplish their goals, they would have to get their father drunk, otherwise it would never happen. This shows first of all how Lot did have some standards, but it also shows how Lot didn’t inspire a massive amount of respect from his family.

Obedience has its rewards and disobedience has its consequences. A consequence of Lot’s incest with his daughters was the birth of two peoples, the Moabites and the Ammonites who became sworn enemies of God’s chosen people the Jews.

It has been a trendy thing to say ‘I like Jesus, but I don’t like the God of the Old Testament’. The fact is they are the same. God is full of love and because of this he is just. God doesn’t want anyone to perish, and that’s why he sent his only son as a sacrifice (John 3:16-17). Sodom is actually a testament to God’s long-suffering nature – see how bad it had to get before God decided enough was enough! What is also evident in this passage is that Jesus was present throughout the Old Testament as well as before that and ever since. As Jesus himself said: ‘Before Abraham was born, I am,’ (John 8:58 NASB). Jesus was of course referring here to his eternal nature, but also the fact that he was divine – ‘I AM’ was the name of God first discovered in Exodus (3:14), so anyone saying that Jesus never claimed to be God has been misled. This was what Jesus meant, and this is what was understood at the time, explaining why the Jewish authorities hated him so much and ended up accusing him of blasphemy.

So God is long-suffering, but he is also just. We may think sometimes that he takes a long time to act, but he will act, and when he does he will be perfectly just. Love and justice are bound up together. If we claim God is a God of love, then we must also accept that he is a God of justice – after all, if he loves us, why would we expect that he will turn a blind eye to those who want to hurt us? He won’t and he doesn’t. Sometimes it appears that he is disregarding injustice, but actually he is waiting for the perfect timing. There were not many righteous people in Sodom – less than ten, and that’s why it had to be destroyed. But no one can ever say that his judgment is unexpected and unfair. Had the people of Sodom repented, the story would have been different, but as it was, God waited until they had completely rejected redemption before he judged them. He gave them every opportunity and they blew it.

Chuck Missler has suggested that one of the reasons for the destruction of Sodom was the existence of the Nephilim, those beings who were a product of the union between fallen angels and women. This is absolutely possible, and perhaps most likely, as there have been many cities since then that have been as sinful as Sodom, but have not been judged. Chuck’s view is that as the devil was attempting to pollute and distort the line from Adam to the Messiah, God had to remove these people from the earth so that the devil’s design wouldn’t become reality.

 

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 18

In this chapter, we see three strangers approaching Abraham. According to the custom of the day he rushed out to offer them food, drink and accommodation (bearing in mind it was the hottest part of the day, and so it was likely that they would be in need of all three – hospitality was freely offered in this culture, not least to keep one’s ‘friends close, and one’s enemies closer’). As we read this chapter we see that Abraham, despite his failings, was aware of the sufferings and needs of others, and sought to relieve their discomfort. This is entirely fitting behaviour for the patriarch. It’s something we should be doing today also because the Bible says: ‘Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by this some have entertained angels without knowing it,’ (Hebrews 13:2 NASB). Two of these visitors were angels, the other was in fact a theophany, an Old Testament appearance of Jesus the Messiah. Jesus pops up quite often in the Old Testament. Abraham was the model host. He was attentive, prompt and honoured the guests by spending time with them and sharing the best of what he had with them. This is what we need to do, not only with others, but also with God.

The three visitors came with a message for Abraham and Sarah, that the time was coming when the promises God had made them were to start being fulfilled. Sarah laughed in unbelief. The visitors noticed and she denied that she had laughed – but she did laugh, and the unbelief meant either she thought God was wrong, or that God was unable to to do what he had promised. Either is serious. But the response was ‘Is anything too hard for the Lord?’ Of course it’s not, but especially today we see huge evidence of unbelief from people who call themselves Chrsitians. Not taking the Bible seirously, denying literal fulfilments of prophecy, allegorising passages instead of taking them as they are, are all ways that people try to cover up the fact that they don’t believe God either tells the truth, or is able to do what he says.

The next way that we see Abraham concerned for the welfare of others is in interceding for the people of Sodom. Jesus told him that the situation was desperate there and that they were descending too far into sin. Abraham didn’t argue with that, he was concerned for the righteous people, and didn’t want them to get tangled up in the judgment of Sodom. Bravely he challenged the Lord to reserve judgment, whittling the numbers down to only 10 righteous people – if there were so many righteous people, God promised not to destroy all of Sodom. In the event of course, Sodom was so far gone that there weren’t even this many people that were righteous in the city.

In this one chapter we see the various roles Abraham takes on as he belongs to God – he provides for the needs of strangers, he involves his family and household in this ministry, he develops an ever closer relationship with God, and he intercedes for the needs of others.

Genesis 17

By this point God had already made his single-sided covenant with Abram. Abram slept through the whole thing while God made the commitment. In this chapter, God institutes the practice of circumcision for Abram and his family, and for what will become his chosen nation, Israel. Also, because during Bible times names were so important, God changes Abram’s name to ‘Abraham’ meaning ‘father of many’. This was another promise that God would fulfil what he had prophesied. This has in fact come true because not only do Jews and Muslims trace their heritage back to Abraham, but so also do Christians who are considered to be the spiritual children of Abraham.

As for the land that God promised, the title deeds are unconditional, that land belongs to the Jews – but that’s not to say that they couldn’t be removed from it from time to time as they rebelled against God. This has happened, and now they are in the process of returning to it for the final time (as we see from Ezekiel).

Circumcision was instituted as a symbol of belonging – it didn’t say anything about a person’s salvation, it merely was a symbol of the parents’ obedience.

Genesis 16

Scheming and deception shows a lack of faith, this is what caused Abram and Sarai to go to Egypt and fool the Pharaoh, and this is why Sarai sought to fulfil God’s prophecy herself. She couldn’t believe that God would fulfil his promise that she would bear a son, and therefore she engineered the situation, giving her maid (an Egyptian maid was always going to be trouble) to her husband in the hope of the maid getting pregnant and carrying on Abram’s line. In the event she did get pregnant and gave birth to Ishmael,  but this was not the fulfilment God intended, and therefore what they had engineered as a fulfilment ended up causing strife – and has done for millennia since, with the descendants of Ishmael seeking to wipe out the descendants of Israel for all this time.

The fact was, God had promised the pair a son, but he hadn’t said when that would be. They weren’t to wonder, they were to wait. That’s what obedience is, most of the time. With impatience comes disobedience, and with disobedience comes not taking God at his word. God said they would have a son; in time, Sarai and Abram stopped believing that – to the extent that they decided to work round it. As soon as you stop taking God at his literal word – you’re heading for trouble. Part of the problem was that Sarai and Abram were getting hung up on the baby part of the promise. Actually the baby was the smallest part of what God promised them – he promised them that they would be the head of a family that would become a nation, a nation that would be extraordinarily blessed by God. Circumstances needed to be right – and they needed to be right in such a way that Isaac’s birth would be recognised for what it was – a miracle. Obviously at the age of 85, Abram wasn’t quite ‘past it’ enough for God’s liking.

The Hagar thing was a scheme – and it was not God’s will, therefore it was a sin. Unfortunately sins have their consequences – and the consequences to this sin have been huuuuuge. First of all, because all three of them had taken their eyes off God, they were subject to their own petty emotions, they started to get all selfish, and were mean to each other. Petty grievances came out, ending in Hagar being banished, after Abram washed his hands of the whole matter. Everybody was blaming everyone else, no one was happy, the whole thing was a mess.

God met Hagar in the desert, and told her to return to Sarai and submit. This would have taken a reasonable amount of faith after Sarai had been horrible to her. She would have to return and submit, possibly to Sarai’s cruelty. God, in his grace, blessed Ishmael and made his descendants into a great nation – it is likely that many of the Arab peoples are descended from Ishmael. Unfortunately, the latter part of God’s prophecy has already come true that this people would be hostile, and would target the descendants of the true son (Isaac) in particular. This conflict remains today, and will remain until Jesus returns.

Yes, there were consequences to sin, but all involved were forgiven and restored to their rightful places. All of them in turn needed to submit to God, and to make the three-way relationship work, that surely is what they did.

Genesis 15

Even when there’s nothing, there’s God.

God came to Abram, and reassured him that He was with Abram, protecting him. When we’re feeling a bit rubbish, instead on looking inwardly and dwelling on ourselves and our own problems, it is far healthier to dwell on God and his power. Not only does this stop the problems appearing insurmountable, but also it gives us a more realistic order of things. If we belong to God, then we have no business allowing things to squash us. There are solutions, and it always boils down to God. Abram doubted what God had told him, but God reassured him. It can seem sometimes that God isn’t doing much, there’s a lot that we can’t see. Perhaps Abram felt like this; that those promises that God had previously made were not resulting in anything. Perhaps he thought God had got it wrong, or had forgotten, or perhaps he thought he had misheard. Doubt can be hugely flattening to the spirits.

It happens so often that after a period of high emotion, of victory and euphoria, there’s a valley of depression and dinginess, or just plain not knowing what to do next. It is here, after Abram has taken part in rescuing his nephew Lot that God once again came to him – and not only that – he reaffirmed what he had already promised and also made a covenant with Abram and his descendants. If you’re alert you’ll notice that God does all the work – Abram just sleeps through the confirming of the covenant. This is important, it shows that the covenant is not conditional in Abram and his descendants playing their part – it’s all up to God. God promises him that Abram will have a son, that God is speaking literally. His timetable might not always be as we would like it, but it is always perfect. Once we look back, often we can see that for ourselves – God may take his time, but he’s never late.

Abram’s doubt stemmed from wondering how God could possibly do all he promised – he was looking at worldly limitations such as his and Sarai’s ages, and her barrenness. It’s not for us to wonder how God is going to do stuff, it is for us to be obedient and to trust him. We have something that Abram didn’t have – a Bible chock full of prophecies that have already been fulfilled in a literal manner. That is how God fulfills prophecies – so that there’s no ambiguity. God fulfilled the promises he gave to Abram literally, as with all the rest of fulfilled prophecy, and as he will do with the prophecy that is left to be fulfilled.

When God affirmed to Abram what he would do, Abram believed him – and God counted that belief as righteousness. That’s all we need to worry about – we need to believe God, and take him at his word. Nothing else is really our business. This is the essence of a relationship with God. This is where Christianity differs from every religion or belief system – everything else requires works or special knowledge; all God requires from us is faith. Naturally when we live in faith the acts follow, such as Abram being prepared to sacrifice his son, but it’s not the works that are the deal with God, it’s what’s behind them, the righteousness that really floats his boat, it’s the faith.

It’s easy to think that Israel’s always been there. It hasn’t. It was centuries after this dialogue with God that Israel became established, and then in the first century AD, Israel was cancelled out, and the Romans nicknamed the area ‘Palestine’ in an effort to remove every trace of Jewish history that there was there. For centuries believers were reading their Bibles and assuming that perhaps God was breaking with tradition here and maybe he had changed his mind about the Jews, or was not going to fulfil this prophecy literally, that Israel would never be established. Even as late as the 1930s people were still doubting whether there really would be a reestablishment of Israel. And yet there was. And now, it’s like it’s never not been there, to the point that we often take it for granted. It’s a miracle. For centuries people could not see how this could happen, how a people who had lost their country could survive outside of their nation for the best part of two thousand years, and then return to it – not least because they hadn’t even been using their native language! But yes, today, Hebrew is a language that is spoken by millions every day, even the language itself has been resurrected! God keeps his promises, and he keeps them literally, and spectacularly!

Genesis 14

In the Old Testament, it doesn’t seem to be quiet for five minutes. In this chapter Lot gets tangled up in an international war. At the time he may have found it impossible to figure out how being taken captive could possibly have been God’s will, however, on two counts it was probably a good thing. First of all, this upheaval would more than likely have got him thinking. When chaos happens, it is a lot easier to see what is important in life – those things that we seem to care about the most; money, possessions, comfort, don’t seem quite so important as safety, eternal and otherwise. Perhaps this got Lot thinking. Maybe – but it’s likely that it was designed to. The other good thing to come out of the whole affair was that Lot was rescued by Abram and therefore he was back in his company, with the opportunity that something righteous might rub off on him! It was also a way of removing him from the damaging society of Sodom.

Abram didn’t pick sides in the conflict – he was not involved until he needed to be. It’s important that political ideals don’t affect our faith – rather it is to be the other way round. We are never required to compromise what we know to be true. If it looks like being the case, we are doing the wrong thing. Thousands of believers have led complete and useful lives without compromising what they know to be true. The perfect example of this is Daniel. There is nothing he did that compromised his faith or knowledge of God. He worked within the bounds of his faith to do what was expected of him. Forced to make the choice between earthly orders or divine, he chose God every time.

Melchizadek, King of Salem is a type of Jesus the Messiah. Here we have someone offering Abram bread and wine (symbolic of the body and blood of Messiah) and a blessing. This was more attractive to Abram than the worldly goods that the other king, Bera, offered to him. In return Abram gave him a tithe of everything. Abram didn’t accept his share of the spoils because he didn’t want it compromising his walk with God and his testimony. He didn’t want to have his wealth credited to this event, but rather credited to God. He knew, possibly from his sojourn in Egypt, that it is easy to be led astray by material possessions. He didn’t stop the others from accepting their shares, however. What was important to Abram was his relationship with God. The others didn’t have that, and so there was no real reason to pass up on their share of the spoils.

So the important thing here is – don’t compromise. If you’ve got something to live for, live for it. Don’t take your eyes of it, don’t devalue it, and don’t pass up on its rewards.

Genesis 13

What should you do as soon as you realise you’re lost? Go back, retracing your steps to the first place you get to that you know where you are and where to go from here? Abram and Sarai did just that – they went back out fo Egypt and back to Canaan, back to where Abram had built an altar to God. It was there that he rekindled his relationship with God.

As time passed Abram was gradually turning into a man of God. When he returned to Canaan with his extended family (including Mr and Mrs Lot) he realised something; Lot was after building a little empire for himself, whereas Abram was discovering this wasn’t compatible with getting closer to God and following him.

It was inevitable that at some point they would part ways. Abraham gave Lot a choice and he chose the apparently more fertile area of Jordan (although it contained the soon-to-be notorious Sodom and Gomorrah). They parted in peace.

After Lot has departed for Sodom, God repeated his blessing to Abram, that he would father a vast nation, and that the land he was now standing in would be given to them forever. Abram in turn built another altar dedicated to God.  This signalled his change from leaning on his own skills of manipulation and deception, back to relying on God and putting his faith in him.

Abram’s return was not without its consequences; while in Egypt, Hagar became Sarai’s maid. This was later to cause them much trouble as they sought to fulfil God’s prophecy by themselves. Even though God forgives us and takes us back no matter what we’ve done, there are generally consequences to our sins.

Because of the wealth amassed by Abram and Lot, this caused strife, and emphasised that although Abram was intent on building a relationship with God, Lot was more interested in building more wealth. Abram made the mature decision that these two attitudes were incompatible, and perhaps because of his renewed closeness with God, he recognised that it would be more likely that he would be led astray by Lot’s materialism, than Lot would be to start following God. Abram offered Lot whichever piece of land he wanted, this showed that Abram was more interested in maintaining a healthy relationship at a sensible distance than he was about getting the best land for himself. Lot chose what he considered to be the best land, and off he went. The relationship stayed intact, yet there was a reasonable distance between the two relations which enabled Abram to continue developing his relationship with God without the influence of Lot. Lot wasted his chance of becoming closer to God, he squandered it, being unable to see beyond worldly wealth. Abram was not unreachable, and neither was God, but by leaving in pursuit of more fertile land of his own, he was firmly stating his commitment to the building of wealth, and not God.

Genesis 12

The first chapters of Genesis show us something that we should never forget; human nature is nothing to be proud of; quite the reverse – but also, it hasn’t changed much over the millennia. That’s why every bit of the Bible is relevant to us today.

God called Abram out of Ur of the Chaldees, an area where the inhabitants worshipped the moon god Nannar. Did Abram also worship Nannar? Quite possibley– we have not evidence to suggest he did or he didn’t.

Abram was 75 years old when God called him. This was a man mired in the worship of idols from an early age. It is interesting that God waited until Abram was 75. Why 75? He had been adult for a long time at this point – so why not earlier? Was God waiting for a level of maturity? Was God revealing knowledge to him prior to this, or was Abram ready to fall out of his tree when God made contact with him at the age of 75?

75 is a good age to retire – in fact most men today retire ten years earlier than this. So God went to Abram who was cracking open the pipe, slippers and the biscuit tin, and said ‘Tell you what old cocker, why don’t you give up your spiffy house with stairs and follow me, you can live in a tent!’

Strangely Abram said yes. And that’s the mark of a man of God, when a person will choose to do the opposite of the most prudent and sensible thing, just to get that little bit closer to God.

God asks people to do the unlikely, but he also chooses the most unlikely to follow him and to obey him. Look at Abram; who could be less qualified to be the Patriarch of a people set aside by God to be his nation, than a man married to a barren woman? Or look at Moses; who could be less qualified to lead the children of Israel out of Egypt and into the Promised Land than a man who is terrified of public speaking, has a speech impediment and an Egyptian fatwa against him?

God picks the unlikeliest people to do the unlikeliest things. It’s like picking the most short-sighted, slowest, uncoordinated people or the most waterphobic people to make up an Olympic synchronised swimming team. If it wasn’t God’s idea, it would be just plain nuts.

Not only did Abram get called to be the patriarch of the people who would produce the Redeemer, but he became the father of an entire nation, a nation dedicated to God. Not only were they to be holy, they were to be a nation of priests who would teach the nations about God (OK, it didn’t happen, but that was the plan – but Jesus came, and saved gentiles, and that prophecy was fulfilled through one man).

Abram followed God by faith. That doesn’t mean he had some vague notion of what he was supposed to do, or that he woke up one day with a weird idea. No; God appeared to him and left him in in no doubt that he was the one true God, and that idols including Nannar are just dead bits of junk.

God was asking a big thing and he gave Abram everything he needed to obey. There is nothing that is vague or puny about God. If you’re a bit vague about something it’s possible you haven’t heard from God. Having said that, God did tell Abram to leave behind his relatives, but he did take Lot with him, which wasn’t quite in the instructions.

In a way we are more blessed than Abram because we know more about God. If we look at the first 11 chapters of the book of Genesis, not a lot has been revealed about God:

  • He’s the true God
  • He’s alive and involved
  • He’s the Creator
  • He’s got a serious issue with sin
  • He’s merciful
  • He’s going to send a Redeemer because he is grace.

Abram knew the weeniest bit about God, but he was willing to follow. We know far more because far more has been revealed to us – so we have very little excuse. In fact the way Abram dealt with God is the way we should deal with him today – and that is in faith. Abram didn’t know where he was going, or why, or what would happen, but it was enough for him that God had told him what to do – and he did it (with a few diversions along the way).

When God called Abram this signalled the beginning of a marathon. Abram and Sarai were to follow. They knew enough about God to follow (because he had revealed enough to them) however, he spoke to Abram directly about seven times. That’s not many times considering the length of Abram’s life. So what happened in the in-between times? Abram and Sarai didn’t have warm fuzzy feelings all the time, in fact that was rare. Most of the time they had to grit their teeth and hold fast to what God had told them. And that is just like us today; we cannot always have mountaintop experiences, we have to hold on to what we’ve been told (the Bible) and stay fast. Read Ephesians 6 which tells us about the absolutely essential pieces of armour and weaponry that every believer needs. This is why it is essential that we read, study and meditate on our Bibles so that we don’t get led astray from God and what he wants for us. Perhaps what we know as Genesis 12:1-3 are what Abram meditated on.

All information provided by God was on a ‘need to know’ basis. Abram didn’t need to know ‘why’ he just needed to know what God was promising him, and that God was trustworthy.

God told Abram to leave his family and Ur of the Chaldees. One out of two ain’t bad – he left Ur but took his family with him. Lot was not a man of massive integrity so it is interesting to consider how much his actions and values affected Abram and Sarai. Perhaps things would have gone more smoothly for Abram and Sarai had they been absolutely obedient. One thing is for sure; when we disobey, we are not hurting God as much as we are hurting ourselves. Where God is concerned, compromise is never a good thing. Why? Because God is perfect; bringing his perfect will together with something that is not his will is sin. It is dragging his will through the mud. We can’t bargain with God.

As Abram reaches Canaan, God appears again to him to confirm what he has promised. God travels with us. Sometimes it is surprising where he pops up.

What was step one? Step one was God committing to Abram and Sarai and promising them things. What was step two? Step two is Abram and Sarai responding with faith. It’s the same with us. Jesus has promised us salvation, eternal life, a changed character and restored relationship with God. How will we respond?

What’s the C word? It’s commitment. And it’s seriously untrendy. God is not hip (at least not in this). God asks for commitment. In fact if we’re ever going to amount to anything eternally significant we need to commit to him. Otherwise we’ll cut a pathetic figure, running from one thrill to another, failing to grow, failing to mature, failing to achieve. We’ll be bonsai believers. More on that another time. If God’s house is built with believers being the stones and foundations, what happens if there’s no cement?

Abram shows us that our spiritual life should be a journey; it doesn’t have to be geographical but it does have to mean progress. So in our journey where are we? Are we pulling out of the drive, are we going through beautiful countryside or are we locking the doors because we’re going through a dodgy area? Or perhaps we’re staying a little too long in that motorway greasy spoon. We need to always be aware of where we should be heading and be committed to getting there.

Abram built an altar wherever he pitched his tent. There’s no need to get overly religious about stuff – but it is important that God is our first and most significant consideration.

Just when you’re getting the hang of following God, even then it’s weird. Just when you’re starting to be just the teeniest bit pleased with yourself, Bam! It happens, that something you never bargained on. And you feel a bit miffed because all you were doing was obeying God, and well, if this is the reward you get you might as well work out if it’s worthwhile doing something else instead. That’s what Abram and Sarai were going through when they arrived in Canaan, really chuffed with themselves, and then God sent a famine. Bear in mind that famines weren’t all that commonplace; and there’s no evidence to suggest that Abram and Sarai had ever had to cope with a famine before. And the fact is, had they ignored God, probably they’d be tucked up cosily in Ur in a house with stairs and not starving in a tent in a place where the locals burned babies.

But that’s what God does sometimes; although he knows us perfectly, he tests us so that we know what we’re made of. We aren’t to expect an easy ride when we follow God because we certainly won’t get one. Quite the reverse, in fact – God uses all sorts of events – and people – to develop our character. God wasn’t going to starve Abram and Sarai, but he was going to use a famine to test their faith in him, as well as to build that faith.

Trees need wind. As well as water and nutrients, trees need wind. Why? Because in order to develop a strong healthy root system, trees need the stress of being blown about by the wind in order to develop their roots.

Did Abram and Sari pass the test? No. they went to Egypt. I wonder whose idea that was. Had they sat tight and waited on God something amazing would more than likely have happened. Instead, they sought their own solution to the problem.

In situations like this (not that you might find yourself in a tent made of animal skin, feeling peckish anythime soon) it always pays to sit tight and wait. Wait for God. God is a little bit (not a lot) like a driving examiner. When you’re on your test the examiner will give you directions only when you need to turn. You just keep driving in a straight line until the examiner tells you to do something else. If Abram and Sarai had waited, who knows what may have happened? If might be that God wanted them to go to Egypt but we will never know. And Abram and Sarai will never have obedience credited to them at that point because they pre-empted God.

Unfortunately going your own way brings new trials. Abram and Sarai got to Egypt, and news of Sarai’s beauty quickly spread – even to the palace. Sarai was taken into Pharaoh’s harem, but not until Abram and Sarai had hatched a plot – they agreed to spread word that Sarai was Abram’s sister so that Abram wouldn’t be killed. Strictly speaking, Abram wasn’t lying when he said Sarai was his sister – if you remember, she was his half-sister. But spreading this sort of half-truth is as bad as lying, or perhaps it’s worse, if Abram might have justified himself by saying he wasn’t telling lies as much as not telling the whole truth. This shows a tremendous lack of faith in God. God told him what his purpose for Abram was – and it didn’t include getting murdered in Egypt. This sort of behaviour is deceptive; not only is it devious and aiming to mislead people, but also Abram deceived himself that he hadn’t done anything wrong, wasn’t lying, and was only protecting himself.

Just by going to Egypt, Abram went from a man with an altar in everywhere he called a backyard, to a man who was willing to hand his wife over to a tyrannical ruler who killed husbands so he could steal their wives. What went wrong? Lack of faith, that’s what.

A man is called to care for his wife and protect her, not hand her over to a bully in order to get protection. So many times things could have gone horribly wrong as a result of Abram and Sarai’s lack of faith and their plotting to prepare for God’s failures. All they needed was more faith. But God forgave them, and they became the head of God’s people, the Jews. We’re always going to slip-up, it’s inevitable, but that’s not to say we should permit it. We should fight against doing the wrong thing, we are to fight against pride and lack of faith. We can do this by focusing on God, the more we focus on him, the less pride we have and the more we have faith in him and what he can do.

Genesis 11

Yet again, God has to intervene when humanity goes bad. Because at this time there was one universal language, there was nothing to prevent widespread plotting. The episode of the Tower of Babel is a prime example of God being sovereign. The people in Nimrod’s city wilfully disobeyed God’s command to scatter and populate the earth. This was their first sin. Their second sin was to plot together to build the tower (a ziggurat) which would have been used for astrology. Instead of being bound together with a common love of God, they were bound together with a common language and a common pride in their own abilities. It is likely that the people preferred to band together to protect themselves, rather than to trust in God’s protection, and therefore the city of Babylon was the result. Nimrod, the founder of Babylon, it has been surmised, was of the type that would claim to provide protection for citizens if they were to turn themselves over to him and become under his power. In fact this is very similar to what Joseph was to do as Egyptian prime minister later in Genesis. The difference however, was that Nimrod was trying to be as a god to the people, and this is how the Babylonian religion began (see the excellent book ‘The Two Babylons’ by Alexander Hislop for details).

It is almost incredible that the short time between Genesis 10 and Genesis 11 can lead from the peak of Noah’s ministry to the depths of sin as people attempt to try to write God out of reality – rather like secular humanists today. The tower was not about being close to God, but rather it was a display of human power, and reflected the sin in the Garden of Eden – trying to become not close to God, but rather like God. Adam and Eve were already as close as they could get to God, but that wasn’t enough for them, they wanted to be ‘as gods’ (Genesis 3:4). It’s the same here. People are not interested in a relationship with God, but rather they want his power, his authority. Today this is done in a variety of ways – the ways may have changed, but the sentiment is the same. Today people will reject God, and therefore promote humanity as the guiding force of the universe, not only that but because of tremendous scientific and technological developments, we are now able to prolong life, to wipe it out completely, or help it begin with the use of IVF methods.

People play at being ‘god’ all the time. They always have – and the Tower of Babel was just such an example. Instead of scattering and populating the whole earth as God had commanded, they rejected him and gathered together. God could have destroyed the people, but instead, to prevent them from being successful, God confused the languages and scattered them; had he not done so they would have succeeded in their sin and been judged for it, which would have resulted in death. This action also served to prevent similar things happening in the future. That’s what he did – but it is likely significant that politics today is moving towards bringing us all back together again, as the Lockheed Corporation has said to ‘reverse the Babylon effect’.

Babel and its later incarnation as ‘Babylon’ is known as the epitome of man’s rebellion against God. This is right through the Bible, from here in Genesis with the Tower of Babel, through the Old Testament when the Jews are exiled to Babylon as punishment for their disobedience, to Revelation where Babylon, and the accompanying prideful attitude against God will be dealt with for the last time. Whenever Babylon is mentioned in the Bible it is an ungodly thing, something that is rebellious and unclean, epitomising worldly pride, defiance, corruption and humanism. Frequently in the Bible religions are represented as women, and idolatry as adultery. Babylon is mentioned right at the end of the Bible in Revelation as a prostitute. The true Church is described rather as a chaste and beautiful bride.

God undid his action at Babel at Pentecost – people of various nationalities were touched by the Spirit and were able to witness in different languages. This was a dramatic reversal, but sin this time, tongues or not believers have been united in their common love of God, regardless of their background.

Genesis 11 is a chapter where we get more genealogy. There is a reason though, and that’s to show the fulfilment of Noah’s prophecy that Shem’s line would be the one to produce the Redeemer. What is instantly noticeable is the difference between this and the previous genealogy. This one emphasises how young the men are when their first son is born, and how long they lived; this shows how considerably short lifespans are compared to those of the ante-diluvian people. Why? The degenerative effect of cumulative sin in creation.

Genesis begins with a broad view of all of creation by zeroing in on Abram and then focusing down to the 12 sons of Jacob. First the creation, then the fall, and after that the path towards a redeemer. Interestingly Abraham is addressed as a ‘father’ when the irony is he and his wife Sarah were unable to have children. This is the Biblical pattern of the world being blessed through the children born to previously barren households (see also Samuel, John the Baptist – and of course Jesus who was born to a virgin). It’s interesting that God started with a man and his family – the family expand into a nation, and then the whole world is blessed through this people. This is an example of how important God considers the family to be. And in fact, we see how important the family is for society today, because in those areas where there is widespread family breakdown, there generally tends to be an increased crime rate, increased unemployment, and massive disenfranchisement.

At a time of idolatry including the worship of fertility goddesses and the performing of fertility rites, it’s quite interesting and significant that the merciful God should select an ageing couple who were barren. It is also interesting that Ur of the Chaldees was an area dedicated to moon worship. Is this significant? Possible – the moon god in the Middle East is known as Allah. Interesting that God should take a worshipper of this cult and bring him to faith in himself, the true God.

In the final details of this chapter we see that almost immediately Abraham answered God’s call, he disobeyed to a certain extent. Abraham didn’t leave his family, but took many of them with him, leading to strife later on. However, it is significant that Abraham disobeyed, even in this small matter. Because of the culture Abraham was being called out of, and because of the idolatry that was prevalent, it was important that Abraham left behind all influences of this – but he didn’t, he took his family with him! Straightaway there was the possibility that the whole plan could have been ruined. Thanks to God though, it didn’t – but it’s interesting to see in the Bible when someone disobeys God, even in small matters, there are often consequences – and we shall see this in even greater detail with Abraham later on in Genesis. Throughout the book of Genesis (and in fact, the rest of the Bible) we are shown what God can do with weak people. We all have our failings, but God remains faithful, and he doesn’t desert us or write us off when we really mess it up. Be encouraged, if God could use Abraham and Sarah, he can definitely use us.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 9

This is the chapter which starts with a blessing. It is God’s blessings that enable us to live. Like it or not, we depend on his blessings. The Bible tells us that there are blessings we will receive from God which are not dependent on our faith in him: ‘For He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous,’ (Matthew 5:45b NASB). Of course, without these blessings, nothing could survive. In this chapter God authorises humans to eat meat. This signifies that the previous relationship that humans were to have with the created world was no more – instead of purely caring for creation, humans were now able to eat animals, previously they had only eaten plants. This is significant, it has resulted in humans reducing animals to exploitable commodities. The role of humans changed regarding relationship with animals – instead of looking after them purely pastorally, Noah and his family became hunters of them. The harmony had gone, now the animals would fear humans. God made it clear, however, that in the eating of the flesh, the blood must be drained away. The blood was not to be consumed. This is because the life of the animal is in the flesh (Leviticus 3:17), blood is spilled as a sacrifice – the blood of the Passover lamb (Exodus 12) looked forward to a time when Jesus’ blood would be shed for all sins for all time.

At this point, God also declares that those who murder should be executed. This is because man is made in the image of God, and when murder is committed, the image is defaced; attacking another person is the same as attacking God. Human government was brought in in order to administer justice. God is quite clear that there is a difference between murder and accidental manslaughter. The penalties therefore, are different too. This was essential – because of the fallen nature of people, murder was inevitable. By the time of the flood the whole earth was filled with evil and murder. It was essential to deal with murder to stop chaos from ensuing. By having laws and punishments for the lawbreakers, it can act as a deterrent to potential lawbreakers. Although we are made in God’s image, the human heart is evil and therefore it will lead to destruction. Only God can regenerate the human heart. Laws and punishments are in place not only to punish lawbreakers, but also to restrict vigilante acts.

Warren Wiersbe says that God has ordained three institutions, family and marriage (Genesis 1:26-28), human government (Genesis 9:5-6) and lastly, the Church (Acts 2). They are mutually exclusive – one cannot substitute for another. Although one could argue that whatever laws we have in place today are not working as a deterrent because crime still happens, it can also be argued that the laws themselves and the punishments for breaking them can instil in people a respect for right and wrong, even if they don’t always obey the law. For example, if there were no penalties whatsoever for parking on double yellow lines, then what would be the point in having them? Everyone would ignore them. There would be no respect for them. Sometimes, because of the nature of the human heart respect has to be enforced, it will not naturally be forthcoming.

This chapter contains what is often referred to as the Noahic Covennant. God has an agreement here not only with Noah but with all his descendants throughout the ages and every living creature. It is significant that God has made the covenant with every living creature – seraphim are those living creatures which spend all their time in the throne room of Heaven worshipping God. There are four that we know about; one had aface like a lion, the second like a calf, the third like a man and the fourth like an eagle. This shows that God takes the plight of the living creatures seriously, and that the covenant is quite clearly also made with them. These four creatures are also used as emblems of the four Gospel accounts of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The agreement is that:

  • God will never send another flood to destroy all life on earth. This is unconditional.
  • The sign of the covenant was to be a rainbow, so that people were not to be concerned when the rain started to fall. There would never again be a flood like the one that wiped out most of creation.

The second half of this chapter is in stark contrast to the first. We begin with Noah emerging from the ark and God setting up a covenant with Noah and all his descendants. We end with Noah going about his daily life and falling into sin. How did that happen?

It’s quite easy, it always is. Noah had done so well, he probably thought he was above this type of thing. He was wrong. Noah had begun farming and had cultivated a vineyard. One thing led to another and he ended up in his tent, naked and drunk. It’s not that growing, processing or consuming grapes or their juice is wrong. All of that is fine. What is the problem is the excess. He just drank too much of it. What is a shame is that not only do we know Noah as the man who had great faith and built the ark in which mankind and creatures were saved from the flood, but we also know that he sinned in this way. Perhaps nothing is quite so sad as seeing a person sin who had previously scaled such heights of faith and communion with God. None of us are exempt, even though none of us think it will ever happen to us. I’m sure Noah didn’t either. This whole episode shows us the need to be consistent. Noah wasn’t tripped up when he was accomplishing vast things for God, he was tripped up when his guard was down and he was going about his daily life. It can easily be the same for us. It’s easy to obey God when we see that what we are doing is amazing. It’s harder to consistently do the right thing in the little things of life, particularly when we think no one will notice. Be aware, it’s not the mountain in our path that trips us up, it’s the tiny pebble that we didn’t think was there.

The reactions of Noah’s family members are interesting. Ham almost relished his father’s downfall. This great man who had led them through the flood and enabled them to survive had come to this, and Ham seemed to enjoy it. When believers stumble it’s not a cause for celebration, but a time to quietly help them to their feet and encourage them. Ham saw what had happened (what he was doing uninvited in his father’s tent is a different matter), and instead of quietly sorting out the mess, he told his brothers. His brothers on the other hand responded completely differently. Shem and Japheth covered their father whilst at the same time upholding his dignity. Believers who deal with situations with this level of love and respect are truly doing God’s work.

People have argued that the post-flood world had changed such that grape juice would now ferment, whereas previously it woudn’t. this is highly unlikely – the Bible makes no mention of this; it would be unfair on Noah to be presented in this way if it were not his own fault. rather, it is more likely and more fitting that Noah sinned, and that this episode is inlcuded in the Bible to show us that:

  1. Committed men of God can sin
  2. When they do sin, it is a serious matter and compromises their witness as men of integrity
  3. But also, it leaves other people bereft – their trust in that person has been tested. All sins involve theft somewhere along the line – Noah stole his sons’ respect from them. Could it be that Ham was so disappointed that he failed (or even refused) to cover his father’s nakedness?

Maybe Ham was disappointed and feeling betrayed, or maybe he was just an uncaring disrespectful son. seeing his father frunk, asleep and naked gave Ham the opportunity to do the right thing, but he chose not to do it. life is a long string of opportunities to do the right thing. It’s a marathon, not a sprint; there is no one thing we can do that is big enough that we can put our feet up. We have to be always alert to opportunities to do the right thing, and also have the stamina and willingness to do them.

Shem and Japheth are completely different. It may have been Ham who alerted them to their father’s plight – but instead of giving in to curiosity, they went out of their way to preserve his dignity. They took a blanket between them, backed into the tent so they couldn’t see Noah and dropped the blanket over him so his nakedness was now covered. by bnehaving in such a way they showed their maturity and love; that their loyalty was not shaken. Also they showed righteousness – righteousness is what you do when no one is looking – no one was there to see their actions – their father was asleep.

It is imperative for believers today to seek to preserve those who sins we are aware of, to silently come alongside them and support them. all of us are capable of sin, and any of us might need the understanding and love a Christian brother or sister.

Warren Wiersbe says: ‘on the battlefield of life, Christians are prone to kick their wounded.’ We need to make sure we do not do this. We are to act with love and kindness.

When Noah woke, he must have realised to some extent what had happened, and possibly asked his sons to fill in the details. Noah’s response was not the ‘curse’ that most people think – it was a prophecy. Noah does not have the authority to curse. Judging by the behaviour which is diplayed by his sons, he sees their characters clearly – and the prophecy is based on the playing out of their characters. We know it’s a prophecy rather than a curse because some of it is directed at Ham’s son Canaan. It would not be fair to curse Canaan for his father’s sin. Perpetrators of slavery in later times have alleged that Ham was black, and the father of Africans, and that therefore slavery was a result of the curse, and so it was OK. There is asolutely no biblical basis for this at all, it just shows how keen unscrupulous people are to twist the Bible beyond recognition – and how successful they can be when the average person has no clue what is in the Bible. After all, with this passage, you could just as reasonably assert that Ham was the father of all left-handed people. Had it been a real curse, surely Noah would have cursed Ham himself, instead of one of his children. Rather Noah was merely describing what were to be the fortunes of his descendants, rather like Jacob has done (see Genesis 49).

The Canaanites come off rather badly in this prophecy, and are the people occupying the Promised Land that the Hebrews were to remove. It is not because of this prophecy that they were to be removed, but rather because of the disgusting and immoral practices they indulged in such as sacrificing children by burning them to death. This was something they chose to indulge in, and therefore their downfall was their own fault. The existence of prophecy doesn’t negate free will, it just foretells what is going to happen. God knows what we are going to do before we do it, and that’s how prophecy works, it has no bearing on free will whatsoever.

When Noah prophesies about Shem, he is prophesying about the Hebrew nation. It is through the Jews that we have received the Bible, and Jesus. We have a lot to thank them for. Interestingly Shem is Noah’s second son. There is a major pattern of second sons being favoured above the firstborn (Isaac, Jacob, Joseph and Judah, even in the parable which we know as the prodigal son). Wiersbe explains that the name ‘Shem’ means ‘name’. Interesting then that this should be the ancestor of the people who would preserve the name of God.

Japheth was the ancestor of many of the gentile nations. Japheth’s descendants would spread out throughout the world building settlements and empires, but spiritually, they would need to depend on Shem, as the keepers of God’s name.

When we leave Noah, he has repented of his sin and been forgiven by God. There is no reason to suggest that he didn’t regain his position with God, and continue walking with God until he died. Noah’s example teaches us that no matter how high we climb, falling is always possible – but it’s not irreversible. God will forgive and bring us back into his will. What we also need to remember is that influential believers have more required of them than those who are less influential (Luke 12:48c).

God spoke of the rainbow (Genesis 9:12-17) as a visible sign of the Noahic covenant but the way he spoke of it suggests that it might have been present before the flood (possible as there was water above in the atmosphere).

Wiersbe says: ‘When we are looking at the rainbow, we know that our Father is also looking at the rainbow, and therefore it becomes a bridge that brings us together.’

 

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 8

This chapter opens with the residents of the ark (animal and human) being the only living creatures left on the earth. This is the chapter that looks forward; it focuses on what happened after the flood. Chapter eight shows us that the same God who sends a flood in judgment is the God who makes things anew and makes promises to his people which he will keep forever. Interestingly God only told Noah exactly what he needed to know in order to obey God. He needed to know when the flood would happen – he did not need to know when the flood would recede because he would be in God’s will (the ark) and therefore this information would only serve to satisfy Noah’s curiosity – it would serve no other purpose.

In the first verse of this chapter we come across the verb ‘remember’. This is a slightly different use of the verb to how we usually use it today – it does not imply that God forgot the people in the boat, but merely that after dealing with the flood he turned his attention back to them. This is not to say that he had been ignoring them while they were in the ark, but they may have wondered what was going on outside, wondering what God was doing. It may be that they felt deserted by him even though they knew they were in his will, being in his ark and being safe from the flood, as he promised. It is quite normal to go through periods like this in Christian life, but they do not last forever, and they always yield greater understanding. If we belong to God, there is no danger that we will ever be forgotten.

The flood gradually receded over months. This time must have seemed interminable for the people in the ark. The rain had stopped, the flood level was going down, but now it was clear exactly how much water there was everywhere because it was taking an absolute age to recede. Because of the amount of water and the fact that it came up from the earth as well as down from the sky, it is possible that whole continents were shifted and mountain ranges created which would have helped to redistribute much of the water.

The first bird that Noah sent out was the raven – this was after 40 days of resting on the peak of Mount Ararat. Why did Noah choose the raven? The raven was a carrion eating bird, an unclean creature. It would have found plenty to eat of the floating carcases of creatures that had drowned in the flood. Next, Noah sent out a dove. This is a clean bird. It flew around looking for somewhere to perch, but finding nowhere it returned to the ark. When he sent the bird out again, it returned with an olive sprig in its beak, this showed that the waters had receded sufficiently for trees to begin appearing above the water level. Noah later released the dove again, and this time it did not return. The choice of birds is interesting. The raven, the unclean bird is at home in the world eating dead flesh. The dove, however, returns to the ark, to the protection of God. Matthew Henry likens this to difference between the person who belongs the world and the person who belongs to God.

Noah didn’t enter the ark until told to by God, and likewise he and his family didn’t leave it until instructed to, even though Noah could see that the ground was dry around the ark. This must have been a test of obedience – they had been cooped up in the ark for over a year! Although it all looked OK outside, they had to wait for God’s word. It wouldn’t do for them to have been so obedient and to fall at the last hurdle. This shows how Noah is a man of faith worthy to be included in the hall of faith in Hebrews 11. It was absolutely fine for Noah to find out as much about the current situation as possible – looking out, monitoring the situation, sending out birds, that’s all OK, as long as you don’t depend on your own understanding of the situation instead of waiting on God. By this time the entire family knew that God could be trusted because he had ensured the survival, they knew to wait for him – they knew that obedience is as much doing as it is waiting for on God.

When Noah emerged from the ark, it was like he was a second Adam coming into a new world. His first action shows the correctness of his priorities – he built an altar to God to give thanks. He knew that the animals that had survived the flood were saved by God, and so he made a sacrifice on the altar. There was no selfishness – he did not consider not making a sacrifice in order to make a bigger sacrifice later out of a bigger herd. This shows how God prefers obedience to sacrifices. It would have cost Noah more to make the sacrifice when he did than to wait. God credited this to him as righteousness. It was not the sacrifice itself that pleases God so much as the obedience and faith that was behind it. Therefore, there is no action that can be done that can achieve God’s approval – that way lies legalism. Instead it is the condition of the heart that is behind the action that God looks at. That was why Abel’s sacrifice was accepted and Cain’s wasn’t. It has nothing to do with substance and everything to do with heart. Likewise for believers in Jesus, they know that there is nothing they can do on their own to win God’s approval, but if they put their faith in Jesus then all their actions will be credited with righteousness. It is fitting that the first action in the new world was that of sacrifice. Not only does it reflect our complete reliance on God (no matter if we accept him or not) but also it shows that the sin nature that began with Adam has continued past the flood and continues today. The world, although cleansed, was still subject to the effects of sin.

God decided several things once the humans were out of the ark. First of all he decided not to curse the land any more than it was already cursed through the sins of Adam and Cain. Secondly, he decided that he would never again flood the earth. Yes there are still some judgments to come, but none of them include a universal flood. He also said that there would always be seasons – although there have been instances of droughts and famines, we have always had seasons. It is the rhythm of the seasons, the day and the night as well that enables creatures to exist. Without this rotation, existence would not be possible. It is so easy to take for granted God’s blessings – but these ones of seasons, heat and cold, night and day, and the rotation of the months of the year are so easily ignored – and yet without them we would not be able to exist. In these promises, God shows that he is committed to our survival.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 7

Noah was told of the flood 120 years before it occurred; this gave him more than plenty of time to build the ark. It also gave him and his family plenty of time to warn others – and yet no one took up their offer to enter the ark. Interestingly it is untrue that the animals all entered the ark two by two. Even at this early stage there was a difference between clean and unclean animals. The unclean animals entered the ark in pairs, but the clean animals entered in sevens. Seven is the number of completeness, but it also enabled Noah to use the surplus clean animals not only for food after the flood, but also for sacrifice.

There was plenty of opportunity for people to wonder what was happening, decide that perhaps Noah had a point and to make the decision to enter the ark. But they didn’t. When all was ready, God shut the door of the ark (verse 16). Then the judgment on the earth came. This is reminiscent of salvation. God would accommodate anyone in the ark who accepted the offer. In the event, there were only eight people who answered this call. A remnant. Today the offer of salvation is freely available to anyone who chooses to accept it.

Matthew Henry compares the ark with the Garden of Eden. God put Adam in the Garden of Eden, but didn’t shut him in – so Adam threw himself out. God shut Noah and his family into the ark so that they were safe. In the same way, when we are saved we are shut into the ark of God’s salvation. We are safe forever. Outside of God’s salvation there is nothing but uncertainty. Just like the ark, there is a finite opportunity for salvation – after the Tribulation, when Jesus returns to earth there will be the time when those who are still living will be judged with the dead. No one will be able to claim they have not received a fair chance to accept God.

The rains lasted for 40 days, but the water continued to rise for a further 110 days, peaking at 150 days. The water took a further 150 days to recede. By the time Noah and his family were able to leave the ark, they had been inside for a year and 10 days.

Was the flood universal or was it just in the area that Noah was familiar with? We know that God sent the flood in judgment and to destroy all living creatures over the face of the earth that were not contained within the ark. That means as far as the creatures had spread at least, there was flood. Also, considering people had over a hundred years of warning, they could collect their belongings and leave for areas that would be unaffected by flooding. Noah could have done this himself – and negated the need for an ark.

Not only this, but if the flood was a local one, then God has proved to be a liar – he said there would never be a flood like this one ever again – and yet how many local floods have there been since?

The ark can be seen as a type of God’s will. Noah and his family were safe in God’s will and they survived – those who were outside God’s will didn’t.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 6

When we read about the flood, it’s easy to accept it without thinking about it. However, God is not a capricious God, and flooding the entire world is a significant undertaking. So how bad did it have to get before he decided enough was enough?

The Garden of Eden was only Satan’s first attempt at thwarting God’s redemption plan. In Genesis 6 he’s back, just this time he’s behind the scenes. It is because of Satan’s dealings and his corruption of humanity that God had no choice but to start again. Except he didn’t start again completely – he saved Noah and his family; Noah and his family were the only righteous ones found in the whole of the earth. Their obedience is obvious in that they were the only ones to enter the ark. But we digress.

Satan failed in the Garden of Eden, although he was able to get the humans thrown out of the Garden of Eden by enticing them to sin, they didn’t die immediately, they were able to have children, and this was the problem. For God’s prophecy to be fulfilled, for the Redeemer to come, there had to be people. To make God a liar, Satan therefore had to work pretty hard to wipe out the people. If he couldn’t wipe out the people, what else could he do? He could corrupt the people. This is where possibly the weirdest parts of the Bible comes in. There’s that bit that you probably noticed: ‘Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. Then the Lord said, ‘My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.’ The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came into the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the might men who were of old, men of renown,’ (Genesis 6:1-4). So what’s that all about?

There is no absolute consensus about this passage. There are some, such as Warren Wiersbe who consider that the daughters of men were of the line of Cain, and that the sons of God were the righteous men of the line of Seth. The theory is that when these two lines were mixed, the bloodline of Seth was corrupted with the sins of the line of Cain (remember he was a murderer), and that therefore this made corrupted the line of Seth. There are some problems with this theory. First of all, Seth was not sin-free either, there has been no person on earth since Adam and Eve (except for Jesus) who has not been born sinful. We inherit sin, and we indulge it. However nice or good we are, it is in our nature to sin, and that is the same for Seth as it was for everyone else. There is also no biblical command for the line of Cain and the line of Seth to stay separate. I would expect this if this were the case. It is also not a natural reading of the text.

Another theory which I feel makes more sense, and is subscribed to by Chuck Missler amongst others, is that the daughters of men simply referred to women on the earth at the time, with no regard to which line they were descended from. The sons of God, on the other hand were fallen angels. The theory is that Satan was trying to corrupt the entire human race so that the Redeemer could never even be born. This would make God a liar. It is not a perfect theory, although angels are sometimes referred to as sons of God, these are fallen angels we are talking about. Also, Jesus tells us that there will be no marriage in heaven, and no giving in marriage. So does that mean that fallen angels are able to interact sexually with humans. We don’t know. Neither theory is perfect, certainly, but on balance the second option seems more likely. As Chuck Missler says, when believers marry unbelievers the products of the marriage may be little horrors, but it doesn’t bring about the end of the world as we know it. Both lines were sinful, it’s just that one was more notorious than the other. Yet again, this whole situation is brought about by the scarlet thread. That line that began with the sacrifice in the Garden of Eden and continues until Jesus. Every now and then we get a glimpse of it. In this chapter what we get is Satan trying everything he can in order to break it.

One of the results from this interbreeding is that hybrids were produced, these were called Nephilim. No one’s exactly sure what this means, but we know that it refers to the chimera children that were produced from just such a union. But also, it increased the level and intensity of sin and evil in the world (that is absolutely incompatible with just two clans joining, there needs to be some supernatural input here somewhere). So we have huge amounts of sin.

But as we have said, everyone was sinful for a certain extent, so what’s the deal with Noah?

Noah was a righteous man. That doesn’t mean he was perfect, and neither does it mean he was sinless. It’s just that he had faith. He relied on God, and trusted him. There are a few people who were considered righteous, and they go down in history. There are plenty of contemporary examples such as Corrie Ten Boom, but also the Bible contains many examples of people who were not perfect, yet were considered righteous because they relied on God. Mary’s one, Abraham’s another. Abraham was saved because he was considered to be righteous, not because he was sinless. Mary was righteous and she was chosen to bear the Redeemer himself. There’s a Hall of Righteousness in Hebrews 11.

Noah knew he was not good enough to please God through his actions, he recognised his need for a Redeemer. He recognised his need for God, and knew that by his own efforts he would never be good enough for God. Because of this, and the fact that the rest of the world was depraved and daily sinking deeper into depravity, God chose him to build the ark. Noah built the ark in a righteous manner. How did he do it? He obeyed God. God provided detailed instructions, and it was done according to plan, no more and no less. If we looked further on in the Bible we see that frequently God will give detailed instructions in order for them to be followed to the letter. Obedience is sacred (see Psalm 119). We see this in the way details were recorded after the building of the tabernacle in the wilderness (which was a direct copy of the heavenly one that God showed to Moses) see Exodus 36-40.

Noah had plenty of time to build the ark. That would have been plenty of time for people to jeer at him for what he was doing. You need to consider that what God told Noah would happen was unprecedented. These people didn’t even know what rain was because they had only known water to rise from the earth, not come down from the sky. This alone must have raised a laugh – upside down water, whatever next?! But Noah quietly plodded on, carrying out orders, obeying God. Even though what God had told him probably sounded ridiculous even to his righteous ears. Not only this, but Noah was building a gigantic boat on dry land that was miles from water. How daft! Actually, there was plenty of time for people to repent. 120 years in fact. But no one did. There was just the tiny remnant of Noah, Mrs Noah, his sons and his daughters-in-law.

Interestingly the Hebrew word for ‘cover’ in this passage, which is used to describe Noah coating the ark in pitch, is the same word for ‘covering’ for sins. The same word. Perhaps unsurprising for some, but have a think about it. Noah and his family entered the ark because God deemed them righteous. Believers are saved because have faith in Jesus’ sacrifice and their sins are therefore ‘covered’. It might seem a bit of a coincidence, but that happens a lot in the Bible.

Why did no one listen? Well possibly because Noah was doing some pretty crazy things, building the boat, talking about rain, and judgment. And actually life was pretty good at the time. Matthew tells us that at the time of the flood, people were carrying on, business as usual (see Matthew 24:37-39). Of course there was that funny instance of one of Noah’s relatives being called ‘When he dies it will happen’ which was a nod to some future judgment, and this relative (Methusaleh) was knocking on a bit at the time.

Anyhow, it all happened as Noah had said it would. Noah and his family entered the boat, and that’s when the rain started. You could imagine at first people may have been standing out in it, wondering what it was; perhaps then they remembered what Noah had said, and then when it didn’t show any sign of stopping, perhaps then they got a bit worried. Perhaps some who lived near Noah went to hear what he had to say on the subject – perhaps when they realised that he had boarded the ark with his family they realised they had quite literally missed the boat. That the only safe place away from the rain was on the other side of the door – the door to the ark which God himself had shut.

The ark is a prime example of God being unequivocal. If people were deemed to be righteous, then they were allowed in. Many didn’t and many more than likely justified themselves in their own eyes and in the eyes of others. Perhaps they were persisting in doing wrong and rejecting a relationship with God because they had better things to be doing. Perhaps they were distracted by their businesses; by family events, or even family itself. Perhaps they were doing wrong because everyone else was, or perhaps because ‘anyone who wants to get ahead has to compromise sometimes’. There are countless excuses and justifications for doing your own thing. This doesn’t matter the tiniest bit to God. The final question will be ‘Did you, or didn’t you?’ There will be no moving of goalposts, there will be no unfairness – everyone will take responsibility for their own lives, lifestyles and habits. This was the case during the flood, it will also be the case for every other person. The Passover was another example of God enabling an escape for those who trusted him. Those who followed his instructions, whether Hebrew or Egyptian, were saved. Those who disobeyed suffered the loss of their firstborn. It was as simple as that – and it has been as simple as that ever since. As simple as accepting that God would provide a way for us to be redeemed – Jesus Christ – and accepting this way as the only way. It doesn’t matter if you don’t believe it, or if you don’t believe in life after death, or you don’t believe in religion or don’t believe in anything other than the physical world that you see. There’s no negotiation – God has provided a way, and it is up to us whether we accept it or not. There’s one reason to accept it (accepting that it’s true and that there’s no salvation anywhere else) and thousands of reasons not to accept it. The devil wants to distract us with excuses and reasoning – but God’s offer stands, to be rejected or not. It’s our choice.

Obedience is God’s requirement for us. We will either obey God or obey the devil. There is no sitting on the fence. If we are not obeying God, we are doing the devil’s work. Only in God is there true freedom. If Noah had not obeyed God’s strict and precise instructions for building the ark, then they would not have stayed afloat and even those in the ark would have perished. Obedience is so important – but today it’s so easy just to rationalise and justify – how often have we said ‘It’s just once’ or ‘It’s not a complete lie’? There’s such a trend today to say that there’s no such thing as black and white – but there frequently is – and with God there most certainly is. After all for water to be pure, it can’t be 0.1% arsenic, can it?

According to Warren Wiersbe, the Biblical cubit is generally considered to be about 18 inches long; this would make the ark about 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high. There were 18 inch windows beneath the roof for ventilation and light, and the ark had one door and three decks. The ark was not so much a boat as a floating crate. It was not for getting from one place to another, but rather just to stay afloat for the duration of the flood. Dr Henry Morris calculated that this ark would be large enough to accommodate the equivalent of 500 livestock railway cars, about 125,000 animals. You might wonder how these animals were to be collected. Did Noah go and bargain with them? No, God gathered the creatures to Noah (verses 19-22). The ark episode is the first covenant that God makes with people. It is he who shuts the door of the ark at the right time to make sure all are aboard who are coming aboard, and to ensure their safety.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 5

This chapter is a record of Adam’s descendants. We see that the scarlet thread that begins with the first sacrifice in the Garden of Eden and the protevangelium, continues through Adam’s line. The redeemer could not descend from the bloodied line of Cain, so it goes through Seth. The first example of God passing over the firstborn in favour of a younger son. If you compare this genealogy with that of Matthew 1, the mention of death in Genesis 5 is obvious. Genesis, despite containing the creation, dwells on death and man’s need for a Redeemer; Matthew 1 focuses more on hope and life – and the Redeemer himself.

It’s not just a boring genealogy; Chuck Missler noticed that within the names of Adam’s descendants, there’s a message. Each Hebrew name has a meaning. When you read the meanings in sequence you get the message. Here are the names:

  • Adam ‘man’
  • Seth ‘appointed’
  • Enosh ‘mortal, frail, miserable’
  • Kenan ‘sorrow, dirge, elegy’
  • Mahalal’El ‘the blessed God’
  • Jared ‘shall come down
  • Enoch ‘commencement’ or ‘teaching’
  • Methusaleh ‘his death shall bring’
  • Lamech ‘despairing’
  • Noah ‘comfort, rest’

So taken together, you get ‘Man is appointed mortal sorrow; [but] the blessed God shall come down teaching [that His] death shall bring [the despairing] rest,’ (taken from Learn the Bible in 24 Hours by Chuck Missler).

Methuselah’s name is interesting;; not only have we seen it used to look forward to the Messiah, but it looked forward to the flood.

 

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 4

Eve gave birth to a son. When she said she had been given a man from the Lord, the original Hebrew suggests that perhaps she thought she had given birth to the Redeemer who had been promised. Imagine her shock later when this child grows up to become the world’s first murderer. Because of his actions, Cain ended up losing everything and his role as firstborn was taken over by Seth. This is the beginning of a biblical pattern whereby the firstborn son is rejected in favour of the younger son (see Jack and Esau, Isaac and Ishmael, Reuben and Joseph).

Cain and Abel found work for themselves. Adam had clearly shown them how sacrifices to God are made and what they are made for.

When Cain and Abel made a sacrifice, Abel’s was accepted, but Cain’s wasn’t. It is easy to assume that it is the type of sacrifice that determined whether God would accept it or not; but it’s actually the attitude of the person offering it that determines whether it will be accepted.

David tells us; ‘For you do not delight in sacrifice, otherwise I would give it; You are not pleased with burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; A broken and a contrite heart, O God, You will not despite,’ (Psalm 51:16-17). It is clear that Cain was not humble by the way he responded to God after God rejected his sacrifice. There’s nothing humble or contrite here! Not only this but later on, when God gave the law, sacrifices of grain and vegetables were acceptable, so we can know that this was not the reason for Cain’s rejection.

Cain’s attitude is one of religion whereas Abel’s was one of faith. Abel sought to please God, and did so in faith. Cain’s religious attitude is so prevalent throughout the ages, never more so than today. It’s all about outward appearance; as long as it looks holy, it will do. It’s actually about nothing more than impressing other people with your perceived religiosity. It doesn’t impress God, he hates it. It means you don’t belong to him, you belong to the world, see Isaiah 29:13-14 which says: ‘Then the Lord said, “Because this people draw near with their words and honour me with their lip service, but they remove their hearts far from me, and their reverence for me consists of tradition learned by rote, therefore behold, I will once again deal marvellously with this people, wondrously marvellous; and the wisodm of their wise men will perish, and the discernment of their discerning men will be concealed.”‘ (NASB).

When Cain was angry after his sacrifice was rejected, God took him aside to help him see what the problem was; but Cain wasn’t interested – he was too busy being religious – and this mindset led to murder (how like today!) God warned Cain of the danger of sin, but he wouldn’t listen.

Sin generally doesn’t come alone. Cain killed his brother and then lied to try to cover it up. Not only are lies sticky, attracting other sins, but they lead to stubborn delusions. Cain thought he could fool God by lying! Cain was already deluded at this point, he thought his rubbish sacrifice would ‘do’.

Cain, as a result of his religiosity and pride was turned away to wander the earth after murdering his own brother. God is merciful even when we don’t deserve it. He ensured that Cain would not get persecuted or his sin. He did this even though Cain showed no remorse; he was more bothered about how he would survive than about facing up to what he had done and being sorry.

Because of Cain’s concern, God put a seal on Cain to prevent anyone attacking him. Why would God do this? God is gracious, and didn’t want Cain to be persecuted; it was enough that Cain would be judged and punished by God.

Cain later settled down and built a city which he named after his son. It is interesting to note here that Lamech is the first to distort the sanctity of marriage – he took two wives. This is a carnal family.

Every mark that Cain left on the earth, every descendant is wiped out later by the flood. The only thing to remain of him is a record of his sin and punishment.

Cain’s was a family of people who recognised who God was but didn’t enter into a relationship with him. One of his descendants, Lamech, treated God like a slot machine. He killed a man and expected that God would protect him even more than he had protected Cain. He bragged about his supposed claim on God’s mercy, yet the fact he doesn’t even mention God’s name indicates how far he is from a relationship with God. This is a family apparently existing without God. Through their own skills and abilities they are able to build the city of Enoch, and develop a society that lacks nothing, except God. Ultimately nothing will flourish outside God, and therefore when the wickedness of society reached a certain level, it was all swept away.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 3

The whole of the Bible rests on this chapter; if the events in it had not happened, there would not be any need for people to be redeemed; and God’s redemption plan is the subject of the remainder of the Bible.

This is the first we hear about the devil. All biblical references to the devil are clear that the devil is a spiritual being, he is not an evil force but is a real creature (as untrendy as that belief is), the Bible is quite clear. To not accept that the devil is real lays a person wide open to deception – if you don’t believe he’s real you won’t be watchful and won’t see him coming! It’s the ultimate disguise, by making those who accept the existence of the devil seem ridiculous, and by promoting a widespread rejection of the biblical doctrine, the devil gets free rein to cause as much havoc as he can.

One of the devil’s favoured weapons is truth; not pure truth, but truth with lies mixed in. That’s why in Ephesians 6 Paul talks about the necessity of putting on spiritual armour. We need to be prepared. We also need to know and remember what God has told us (that’s what the Bible’s for). When the devil was tempting Eve he was successful because she only knew ‘roughly’ what God said and so the devil was able to twist God’s words without her noticing. Because this is so highly successful, the devil does exactly the same today, to tremendous effect. We need to be so careful! If we don’t know God’s word, it is very easy to misquote it, change it, add to it or subtract from it (serious stuff according to Deuteronomy 4:2  as it can lead to us and others going astray), it can also lead to us doubting God.

It’s interesting that the devil got at Eve when she was alone. Just as lions and other predators will single out the weakest member in a bunch to prey on, so does the devil. In fact the Bible tells us as much:  ‘Be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour,’  (I Peter 5:8 NASB). That’s exactly how it works. Adam is equally at fault here; God told him about the different trees in the garden, he needed to ensure that Eve understood, and he should have protected her, but instead of that, he blamed her when they got into trouble. This is what the church is for. If we meet together as they did in the New Testament, we will know each other, support each, and disciple each other, ensuring that no one falls away. In larger churches where it’s easy to be anonymous, this is impossible.

What the devil promised Eve was that she and her husband could become like gods if they ate the fruit from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. This is something people have fallen for throughout the ages, whether through Mormonism, the New Age, or even some of the pagan and Gnostic religions. People like to think they are above others, in today’s celebrity culture young people are growing up in the belief that the worst possible fate is to be ordinary.

By knowing God’s word we won’t be fooled. Jesus warned: ‘For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect. Behold I have told you in advance,’ (Matthew 24:24-5 NASB). In days like these when very few mainstream churches take seriously their responsibility to disciple believers, it must fall on believers to ensure they are not led astray by erroneous teachings or wilful deception.

So why was Adam blamed for introducing sin into the world? Not only did he allow his wife to be deceived, but also, when he ate the fruit he did so in full knowledge that he was wilfully disobeying God. Adam blamed Eve, Eve blamed the devil, but the devil can’t force us to do anything, he can only try to persuade us. The choice ultimately is our own.

The presence of sin destroys our relationship with God. Instead of the previous companionship Adam enjoyed with God, he becomes terrified of him and even tries to hide.

That Adam and Eve perceive their nakedness is interesting. Nakedness is connected in the Bible with drunkenness (Genesis 9:20-23) idolatry (Exodus 32:35) and demon possession (Luke 8:26-39). The opposite is to be clothed with righteousness which is still to be fulfilled and is mentioned in Revelation 3:4-5.

Adam and Eve attempt to cover their nakedness with fig leaves (which is laughable given the shape of fig leaves). However, God deals with their nakedness in an interesting way. He could have knocked out a couple of heavenly dressing gowns, but instead he challenges Adam asking where he is. God knows where Adam is, but wants Adam to face up to what he’s done. He later made clothes for them to cover their nakedness; he made them out of animal skins. What’s the significance? As Paul says later (Romans 6:23). The wages of sin is death. The first sin is followed by the first death. An animal is killed (could be a lamb) to cover the nakedness caused by human sin. Later Jesus came and died for all sins for all time so that all who accept it can be saved. The Garden of Eden then saw the first sacrifice which was to foreshadow one which would occur millennia later but which had been planned before the beginning of time. This sacrifice would change the world forever.

God cursed the devil and he cursed the earth. This is the chapter which contains what is known as the protevangelium, the first gospel, which promises a redeemer that will save humanity and conquer the devil (3:15). This was significant for Eve because she was forgiven, the redeemer would be descended from her, a woman would have a significant role in bringing forth the redeemer, even though now she would be subject to her husband, and childbirth would be a lot harder and more painful.

Adam would now have to work for survival. Work would now be hard labour, not the pleasant activity in Eden. Sweat is a symbol of earthly labour. For this reason when garments were made for God’s priests no wool was to be used in case this made the priest sweat while he was about his duties, as this would be unclean.

Adam and Eve were driven away from Eden. The way to the Tree of Life was now closed to them. This way will be reopened by Jesus Christ (Revelation 22:1-2, 14).

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 2

God did not rest on the seventh day because he was tired, but rather he was pleased with the outcome of what he had created.

Within the Garden of Eden there is a blessing and a curse. There is the Tree of Life (a type of Jesus Christ) which is the blessing, but also there is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. It is good not to eat its fruit and it is evil to disobey God and eat the fruit. God frequently sets before us both a blessing and a curse, there is no neutral with God. We are either blessed or cursed. The blessing is always a real blessing, and the curse is more than just an absence of blessing. God wants to bless us, that is clearly his desire.

There’s nothing wrong with work – however work as we know it is very different to the work of the Garden of Eden. Work was easy and fruitful, the work we recognise today is a direct result of sin in the world.

The seventh day of creation, the day that God rested does not follow the pattern set by the preceding days. They all include ‘then there was evening and morning’. This implies that the Sabbath is a different type of day, that it is endless, and also, if you notice, it is the only day that God blessed, he also sanctified it – the Sabbath rest remains important to God, regardless of which day you celebrate it (Colossians 2:16). The difference between the Jewish Sabbath and the Christian one is that the Jewish one looks back at the creation and Jewish laws whereas the Christian Sabbath focuses on the new creation wrought by Jesus’ work on the cross and the covenant of grace.

Why were there the two special trees in the Garden of Eden? To enable Adam and Eve to obey or disobey God’s will as they chose.

What is the first thing in the whole universe to be considered ‘not good’? That Adam is on his own. It was that important to God.

According to Matthew Henry, Adam’s wife was ‘not made out of his head to rule over him, nor out of his feet to be trampled upon by him, but out of his side to be equal with him, under his arm to be protected by him, and near his heart to be beloved’.

There are four reasons why God created marriage. For companionship and to improve people, for a wholesome and healthy sexual relationship, and procreation of children and to enable self-control, and finally to reflect the relationship believers can have with Jesus, the Bridegroom. There will be no marriage in heaven because we will not need it. We will be married to Jesus.

Adam is a type of Jesus: his side was opened to create his bride, and at Jesus’ crucifixion his side was also opened, and this event, his death and resurrection brought the Church, Jesus’ Bride into existence, the new creation.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.

Genesis 1

Genesis means ‘beginning’. But it’s interesting that in the beginning God was already there. Moses knew this when he wrote ‘Before the mountains were born or you gave birth to the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God,’ (Psalm 90:2).

The God of the Bible, it is clear, had no beginning, has no end, and is all-powerful in that he is perfect and unchanging.

Through the Old Testament there are glimpses of the Trinity; the first one being Genesis 1:2 which shows us the Holy Spirit present at creation and another being Genesis 1:26 which has God saying ‘let us’, which shows that the Godhead were involved in creation together. The royal ‘we’ had not been invented at this point!

Just as the three members of the Godhead were involved in creating the Universe, they are all involved in the plan of salvation; God the Father chooses us, Jesus died for our sins, and the Holy Spirit seals us (see Ephesians 1:3-14).

Genesis zooms in; the first eleven chapters are concerned with humanity; then after this, after we hear of man’s descent into sin we hear in the remainder of the book, about God’s people Israel from salvation was to come, through whom all people would be blessed.

Although throughout the Bible God reveals things progressively, we also see the cyclical nature of human history, that is; generation, degeneration, regeneration and back to generation again, (G. Campbell Morgan came up with that one). Only God is able to pull us out of this degenerative spiral.

The Bible has a beautiful symmetry to it. The beginning and end of the Bible appear to mirror each other:

  • Heaven and earth created in Genesis, in Revelation heaven and earth are regenerated.
  • Genesis begins with a garden, Revelation ends with a garden city.
  • Marriage is instituted in Genesis, marriage is fulfilled at the marriage of the Lamb.
  • In Genesis, Satan begins his vendetta against man, and in Revelation Satan is dealt with forever by being cast into the Lake of Fire.
  • Genesis has the origin of death, whereas Revelation sees the end of death.
  • Babylon is built in Genesis and in Revelation it is finally destroyed.
  • And last of all; the redeemer that is promised in Genesis fulfils the last of the prophecies in Revelation and begins his everlasting reign. The scarlet thread that begins in Genesis finds its end.

Genesis 1 tells us that the world was made by God, that nothing that exists was not created by God. At first the world was a formless void. As in the life of a believer, God turns disorder to order, and emptiness to fulfilment (Matthew Henry).

The Bible is a coherent whole, so it is not surprising that the opening of Genesis resembles the opening of John’s Gospel account. Both begin with ‘beginnings’ as does the Gospel of Mark.

Genesis begins with the clear declaration that God created everything that has ever existed. This is expanded on in the remainder of the chapter as we see in what order things were created.

Interestingly, in this chapter where God’s power and authority are so evident he is referred to as ‘Elohim’ which is a plural noun. It is rather less likely that there’s a royal ‘we’ in the original Hebrew and more likely that this is a reference to the triune God and the work of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit n the feat of creation.

The first thing God creates in the universe while it is still formless and chaotic, is light. This is interesting given the symbolism throughout the Bible that light often stands for God’s Truth. That light aids understanding. A second interesting thing to note is that God creates light before he creates vessels to bear the light, like sun, moon and stars (which are created on day 4). As this is the case, where did the light come from? From God himself. John tells us that God is light (John 1:5) but not only that; in Revelation 22 we are told about a time to come when the holy city will not need the heavenly bodies because it will derive its light from God. This is perhaps an early example of the ‘bookend’ nature of the Bible whereby that which is described in the beginning is reflected and fulfilled at the end. Whether the luminaries exist or not, life cannot be sustained without life itself. Right from the beginning of the Creation, God separates. He separates light from dark, an act which is used to explain the difference between order and chaos, between the evil of Satan and the good of Jesus Christ, between Truth and lies. It is important to note at this point that the Genesis formula; ‘There was evening and there was morning a ____ day’ is precise. Occasionally the word ‘day’ is used in the Bible to denote a time period other than a literal 24 day; however, when morning and/or evening is used in the same context elsewhere in the Bible it is always in reference to a 24 hour day.

On day 2, God separated the water, meaning there was an expanse on the earth and an expanse above the earth.

Day 3, involved God separating the water on the earth from dry land. This was also the time that God created the vegetation. God is clear that species are to reproduce according to their own kind; there is no accommodation for evolution theory.

On day 4, as previously mentioned, God created the sun, moon and stars. Again he applies more order to creation as he uses the heavenly bodies to mark off days, months and years.

The sun, moon and stars testify to God, they bear his light. However, it is sad that throughout history people have slipped all too easily into the worship of creation rather than the Creator himself.

Next God created living creations, birds and fish. Notice here that as well as pronouncing them ‘good’ he also blesses them. This is the first time the word is used in the Bible. God later blesses the first man and woman. Man was created last of all creation.

On the sixth day God created animals and insects, and earth-dwelling creatures, culminating in the creation of man. All earth-dwelling creatures are created on day 6, culminating in the creation of man. Interesting in this section is ‘let us make man in our likeness’ (Genesis 1:26) referring to aspects of God’s personality, but also possibly the theophanies of Christ. Man is the only created being in God’s image. This is the only creative act which is preceded by a consultation (Trinity).

Adam was made from the dust of the ground and God breathed life into him. God does not do this to any other creature. God ‘forms’ man out of the earth; it is interesting that this is later echoed as a metaphor for God shaping the characters of believers.  ‘Adam’ means ‘taken from the earth’.

The Hebrew word ‘bana’ means to create something new, to bring into existence. It is this word that is used of God in Genesis 1.

The Hebrew word ‘ruach’ means breath or spirit and it is this word that is used to describe God breathing life into man.

With thanks to my spiritual uncles: Uncle Warren Wiersbe, Uncle Chuck Missler, Uncle Matthew Henry, Uncle Jacob Prasch and Uncle Arnold Fruchtenbaum.